Last saturday a new negotiation text was published in the Climate Change Negotiations in Durban.
The text presents a few interesting points, many of which come from the People Agreement of Cochabamba. See the article on those interesting points here. The problem is, it is quite probable that those proposals don’t get into the final COP decisions.
On the contrary, there is a big push to get all the bad ideas in the decisions. It is impossible to be exhaustive, but I will be reflecting on some of the major problems.
No real mitigation being projected
What the whole climate change negotiations should be looking for in the very first place, is for the necessary mitigation commitments by developed countries More »
After one week of negotiations in Durban, a compilation of negotiation texts was presented, which essentially builds on work during the whole year. There are several very problematic issues in this text, but let’s start with the good news: several issues from the Peoples’ Agreement are present in the text, especially in the Shared Vision chapter1.
Stabilising the Climate in a fair and equitable way
First, the key issue: making sure the climate gets stabilised. More »
For Part 1 on the Kyoto Protocol negotiations click here
The Mandate for the AWG-LCA
As the Climate Change Convention only has principles and general objectives, and the Kyoto Protocol is limited to mitigation issues only, the Bali Action Plan decided in 2007 that the Convention should be implemented in all the relevant issues: mitigation, adaptation, finance, technology and capacity building. In order to bring all those aspects, as well as the Kyoto Protocol, in a general framework, the chapter of Shared Vision was introduced.
By this decision a working group on ‘Long Term Cooperative Action’ (AWG-LCA) was installed, and mandated to find an outcome on all relevant implementation issues. More »
The history of climate change negotiations is a long history of failed promises, and mandates that were not followed. It will probably not be possible to keep track of all the failed promises, but here a brief recount of the most important ones:
The mitigation promise: Developed countries committed themselves to take the lead in mitigation, and return by the end of the decade of the 90’s to earlier levels of GHG emissions. (cf art 4.2(a) of the Convention)
The reality: up till today, most of the developed countries More »
Science is clear: ‘If we don’t act seriously and urgently, it will be too late to reverse climate change’.
Is it economically and politically feasible to make the necessary deep commitments for mitigation? That is a political question, not a scientific one, and depends on the choices nations and humanity wish to make: More »